 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
tags removed
editi removed several tags because in my opinion they don't belong on the article (anymore). the tags were {{Plot}}, {{Notability}}, {{Importance}} and {{in-universe}} . if you feel they should be put back please leave some feedback on why. the one on sources / reference ill try to fix with some sources / reference. Boneyard (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- The article is still almost entirely plot summary with no real-world information in terms of critical analysis, cultural impact, development, etc. Similarly, it's still written almost entirely from an in-universe perspective as nearly all the information is only relevant within the context of the fictional reality. Nor is notability established via substantial coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. You trimmed a bit and added some section headers, but the article is basically unchanged. I'm not familiar with the material, but I doubt this article can be brought up to policy. Do you think this topic specifically (as in, not pieces about the series itself, which contain only passing mention) has ever received direct, significant coverage from sources not associated with the subject? Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 20:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)