Talk:Calcite sea
 | A fact from Calcite sea appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 January 2008, and was viewed approximately 496 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Citation style
editHarvard ref style is perfectly acceptable in Wikipedia and has been basically forever as far as Wikipedia history goes. The reference style of the article is totally self consistent. Wikipedia referencing in general is totally inconsistent or non-existant. Therefore adding that senseless tag with the absurd comment: The current reference style is NOT consistent with the rest of Wikipedia is totally out of line. The article is far better referenced than 90+ percent of Wikipedia, therefor the tagging of this article as was done amounts to near vandalism. Vsmith (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- I wrote that absurd comment in the bad edit summary. Sorry. I must have become sleepy and stupid at the same time last night. I posted that {{Citation style}} tag to ask for external linking of the refs, if available. I'm more used to referencing per WP:PMID, with links to the actual report often included, allowing me to read more on the subject. I'd better not type too much. I'm not totally awake yet.... --PFHLai (talk) 18:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you -- I'm glad someone is reading it!
editAnd I very much understand the sleepy part! Best wishes with your editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilson44691 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)