Talk:Calcium propanoate

Requires neutrality check

This article requires careful examination to ensure that it does not give undo weight to minority positions, that claims are not presented as fact where convenient for one viewpoint (or both viewpoints - NPOV does not mean presenting contradictory extreme viewpoints), and that sources are clearly identified and labeled. For instance, the Food Intolerance Network is not a reliable source by any means - it cannot be used to present factual information, as it is in this article. Similarly, scitoys.com, while a nice site and a handy resource, is not acceptable as a reliable source. It can only present a claim as a claim; it contains nothing that we can call factual information.

I will do my best with this article, because I have no life right now. However, other eyes would be good. Captainktainer * Talk 09:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

I think I've done a decent job of clearing things up. Please note that Baking Management (which I used as a source for bakery industry concerns) is an industry news source; I was careful to make factual claims only for what was patently apparent in the article. There are still a lot of fact tags scattered about; help with these would be appreciated, especially since it's still a heavily POV-weighted section. I would also appreciate it if someone could find a replacement for sci-toys.com information on calcium propionate. Captainktainer * Talk 10:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

How is this slightly toxic?

Is the effect cumulative or non-cumulative? Is the slight toxicity to humans a shoulder effect of being fully toxic to pests and insects? It's even used as a pesticide. Sagittarian Milky Way 17:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Deceptive paragraph

The paragraph describing the metabolism of propanoic acid is deceptive in that it implies that propanoic acid can not be metabolized. Whereas the article on Propanoic acid clearly says that propanoic acid is metabolized by vertebrates without any problem. Dr. Morbius (talk) 20:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

I deleted the sentence that referenced a symptom of a very rare genetic disorder called propionic acidemia. Since this disorder is inherited and very rare, less than 1 in 100,000 people have it, the sentence was irrelevant. Especially considering that it was intentionally taken out of context in such a way as to imply that anyone could experience the symptom. I also edited the sentence about the metabolism of propanoate since it was also intentionally edited in such a way as to misrepresent propanoate metabolism. I used the Propanoic acid article as a reference. Dr. Morbius (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

the URL used by the fifth reference

The designated URL no longer exists.

Learve (talk) 15:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Improved Neutrality of article

I edited some paragraphs to more accurately represent the references that they used. Also removed a link to a site that was completely unreliable and full of pseudoscience and anecdotal evidence. Dr. Morbius (talk) 20:35, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Typo

There is a typo: Replace Ca(C2H5COO)2 with Ca(C3H5COO)2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.40.84.157 (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

•  Fixed -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:05, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

That was not a typo. The original text is correct. Ca(C3H5COO)2 is calcium butenoate. Dr. Morbius (talk) 17:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, you're right, it was correct the first time. Thanks for catching that. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:27, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Calcium propanoate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021214228/http://www.codexalimentarius.net/gsfaonline/additives/details.html?id=306 to http://www.codexalimentarius.net/gsfaonline/additives/details.html?id=306
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100412155551/http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/necfe/pubs/pdf/Venture/venture3_chemical.html to http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/necfe/pubs/pdf/Venture/venture3_chemical.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Question legality of Calcium Propionate in Great Britain

I didn't edit the article itself as I am an inexperienced editor, but I am in the UK and have a loaf of Warburtons Seeded Batch. Calcium Propionate is listed on the ingredients. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msknight (talk • contribs) 20:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Banning section needs at least one reputable source.

The banning claim has been up since at least August 2020, completely without source. Last call. If no reputable source of the banning information is introduced by December 1, the section will be removed. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 03:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Done, removed. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 14:51, 2 December 2023 (UTC)