This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
A fact from California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 6 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The California Agricultural Labor Relations Board does not need its own page separate from the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act (ALRA), which is the law this agency enforces. The ALRA article is more robust and already has info about the operation of the board under its Implementation section. The only thing this article adds to the mix is a discussion about a few specific controversies that the ALRB has faced, which could be added in a "Controversies" section on the ALRA page after someone has straightened out the POV issues. Otherwise, this page should merge with the ALRA page redirecting "California Agricultural Labor Relations Board," ALRB, etc. --Güe(rill)a (talk) 02:51, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Weak oppose Does the board enforce laws other than the 1975 ALRA? Are there details relevant to the board but irrelevant to the act? I think you should assert the topic can be merged, including potential future material, not just the current section making up the board's article; I don't think you've considered if future material relevant to the board will be appropriate in the act's article. int21h (talk · contribs · email) 20:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - Just as there are separate National Labor Relations Act and National Labor Relations Board articles, so too there should be separate ones for the California act and agency. - Tim1965 (talk) 15:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply