Talk:California Coalition for Immigration Reform

Old comments

The movement began in the mid 1980s by local activists who felt the Los Angeles area and California was being overwhelmed by high rates of illegal immigrations. At first, there was media publicity and government critique about they pose as a "hate group" similar to 19th century Nativists and actions like group protesters are publically shouting "anti-foreigner" sentiment (more like asking illegal aliens to go home) was done by the KKK (a white racist group known to harrassed Latinos) as well. But it turned out there are high numbers of Blacks, Native Americans and US-born Hispanics in the CCIR and are backed by mainstream conservative Republicans not neo-Nazis or xenophobes in the fringe (i.e. militias or skinheads) to identicate the CCIR wants improved border security and illegal immigration stings by the INS based on federal law enforcement. + 71.102.7.77 (talk) 04:31, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Bias tag

Why was a "bias" tag added to the article by user:99.238.79.186?[1]   Will Beback  talk  21:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Sources

The article seems dependent on blogs as sources, which are not considered RS, Reliable Sources, according to Wikipedia. More information needs to be found; the group has been around long enough to have been written about in a more studied way.Parkwells (talk) 12:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The reference to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) was removed because it discredited the report and completely eviscerated the credibility of the article. The SPLC has, itself, been identified as a left-wing, anti-Christian hate group by the American Family Association as well as by the Family Research Council and is no longer used as a resource by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a consequence of its unreliability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.110.24.10 (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

CCIR web site

The CCIR web site is referenced in the article. As of today, that site (ccir.net) returns "Site No Longer Available." Individual pages on the site are still accessible, and so the hyperlink for reference 1 still works. At some point, we may want to replace the reference with one at the WayBack Machine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwdavids (talk • contribs) 13:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

The article link has gone dead and I have replaced it with a copy from the WayBack Machine (web.archive.org). Dr. Conspiracy (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on California Coalition for Immigration Reform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ccir.net/mission.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on California Coalition for Immigration Reform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061005203138/http://www.ccir.net/BILLBOARD/BBphotos.html to http://www.ccir.net/BILLBOARD/BBphotos.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100806210333/http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/illegals-illegals-illegals/barbara-coes-calls-for-the-dep/ to http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/illegals-illegals-illegals/barbara-coes-calls-for-the-dep/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)