Talk:California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Category
editinsitutes of regenerative medicine - perhaps institutes for regenerative medicine could have their own category or created as a list.
there are a variety of them --Emesee (talk) 06:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
This page is not very clear
editWow, it is really hard to figure out from this Wikipedia page what CIRM does. It is mostly a funding agency, not a research institute. I don't think that any research is done at CIRM, unlike all of the other stem cell institutes that are listed on this Wikipedia page. The history section here is mostly a deep dive into CIRM's first couple of years, which I guess were controversial, and a listing of a couple of programs that it has funded (not sure why those were selected) without clearly explaining what it does (fund research and create policy). Is it ok to add some background that's a little more of an overview? There is some background on the Proposition 71 and 14 Wikipedia pages, and there are several news articles over the last 20 years suggesting it is important to Californians. Just a few: https://www.sfgate.com/science/article/Science-prevails-3248312.php, https://projects.sfchronicle.com/2018/stem-cells/politics/https://www.sfchronicle.com/health/article/State-earns-first-royalty-check-after-investing-12605742.phphttps://projects.sfchronicle.com/2018/stem-cells/research/https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-california-stem-cell-20190531-story.html SENsters (talk) 21:18, 29 May 2024 (UTC)