Talk:California State Route 247
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 247 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | California State Route 247 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 12, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Classification
editDoes anyone know anything about the history of this road? Then the stub could be removed.--Rschen7754 19:34, May 28, 2005 (UTC)
- Well, you're an idiot and should have looked at the state law.
--Rschen7754 06:29, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 247/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 01:18, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- You should indicate that the portion of SR 247 between SR 62 and Lucerne Valley runs through deserts (you do further along in the route description).
- " In 2001, Caltrans indicated that most of the highway was considered "maintain only" until 2020", what is "maintain only" supposed to mean? Should clarify here.
- It means that it should only be maintained; I think it's clear enough. --Rschen7754 01:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
A couple small issues to be addressed, but otherwise good. Will put on hold. Dough4872 01:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Replied. --Rschen7754 01:52, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- And I will pass the article. Dough4872 02:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)