This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Colton! Here are some of my notes from our first peer review.
- For your first section (California Wild and Scenic River Act), I would suggest linking a Wikipedia page or an external cite for the National Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
- I really liked how you put the purpose of the act and defined key terms
- Maybe you could find a bit more history/background on the act itself and then in a separate section you could do “Comparing and Contrasting the National and California Wild and Scenic Rivers Act”
- The table with all the rivers is a really good addition, I like it a lot!
- I might suggest discussing drought in California and maybe if this act/authorizing environment has any sort of water management set in place
- Talk about what the pros of this act are? What might become of our rivers if this act was never put into place
- Maybe add some background and statistics of California’s rivers “California has approximately 189,454 miles of river, of which 1,999.6 miles are designated as wild and scenic - 1% of the state’s river miles” (I got this from the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System https://www.rivers.gov/california.php)
Overall, I think your draft is really good! I personally didn’t know anything about the National and California acts, so this was very informative! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabriellagp (talk • contribs) 04:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
