Talk:California v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

Untitled

Hi –

Great job on the Wikipedia article! The topic is extremely interesting and you do a good job explaining the key issues and outcomes. I have made a few minor grammatical edits to the page; unfortunately, I did not realize I wasn’t signed in at the time, so all my edits are made under the guise of "199.223.21.100". Below are some overall comments/questions for consideration. Please feel free to utilize and/or ignore as you see fit. Thanks and good job!

• Outline: I recommend elevating "Parties" and "Issues and Arguments" to the first level (i.e., they would become "2" and “3”). I also suggest inserting headers in the “Issues and Arguments” section to differentiate between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants.
• Title: I recommend adding the year and/or court in which the case was heard.
• Issues and Arguments: Define "APA" – I wasn’t sure if this was referring to “American’s with Disabilities Act”, so I did not define it myself.
• Issues and Arguments: The text states “…because the directives issued in 2010 constitute as substantive”. Are the “directives” referring to the injunction on the PACE programs? If so, I suggest revising so the link with the “Background” section is clearer.
• Issues and Arguments: What is meant by “PACE programs increase ‘risk’ on mortgages from creditor to the mortgage holder”? Do you mean, PACE programs “transfer” risk?
• Issues and Arguments: What is a “conservator”? I suggest adding a footnote to help define this term.
• Issues and Arguments: What are “APA notice and comment requirements”? I suggest adding a footnote to help define this term.
• Court Decision: What court “heard” the case? I did a quick Google search and it looks to be the Northern District Court of California, Oakland Division. Is this correct? Was the case heard by a superior court? If so, might want to consider discussing the opinion of the lower court.
• Court Decision: When is the final Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking expected?
• Future Outlook: I recommend adding a section of the future of PACE. For example, what happens when the final ANRP is published? Will PACE then be effective? Or does some other legal process have to be satisfied?

Leyoon (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Team Review

Hi Guys

This is so interesting and so informative. It was a great read! I thought that the length was just right and you didn't overwhelm the page. I just had 2 general questions:

1. Background - How did the 2010 directive impact homeowners with current loans?

2. Court Decision - Would the ANPR include the EIS? If not, when would the EIS be required?

FYI: I just tried to search your topic on Google, hoping to see your page on the 1st search page but it didn’t show up – is there any way you can increase visibility? I think it’ll be a hit! Ssoqo (talk) 06:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of San Francisco supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:55, 2 January 2023 (UTC)