Talk:Callawayasaurus
A fact from Callawayasaurus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 2,006 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIs the spelling Callawayosaurus incorrect? Then it belongs in a footnote to that effect. There is no "sometimes spelled" in scientific writing. In what sense is this a "sea monster"?--Wetman (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- in answer to your questions:
- yes, the spelling is incorrect, it is in a situation similar to Plesioliopleurodon(error for Plesiopleurodon), an error mentioned in the list of plesiosaurs.
- according to wikiproject sea monsters, the animal has to be a large aquatic fossil, it was based of a BBC documentary, but is now mostly used to work on extinct marine reptile taxa
Peace! Ryan shell (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Callawayasaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728102202/http://www.ppne.co.uk/index.php?m=show&id=12604 to http://www.ppne.co.uk/index.php?m=show&id=12604
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)