Talk:Callison

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Need Help

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is my first page to create. I'm having trouble with my image (2201_Westlake.jpg). This is also my first image upload and I can't get the thumbnail to work. Any help would be appreciated.--shARCH (talk) 08:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

This article would benefit from architectural photos

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Although this article does have an image, namely that of a logo, it would benefit from a gallery of architectural photos. Peaceray (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

deletion of content

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I would like to discuss the inclusion of awards content which was recently deleted. (See diff 794593509) The edit summary stated "ads", presumably implying the content violated WP policy regarding advertising. I disagree that the content meets the definition of advertising, and I strongly object to the deletion of content without discussion.

As I read it, this contents is topical to a design & architecture firm. While I am not convinced there is anything wrong with the previous text, what about something like this as a compromise?

Callison has been recognized with awards for design,^[1]^[2] architecture,^[3] and green design.^[4]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbsseven (talk • contribs) 16:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

^ http://emag.digitalpc.co.uk/cmpi/worldarch08.asp World Architecture 100 (Building Design), 2008
^ "Top Green Design Firms 2008', "Engineering News-Record", June 23, 2008.
^ Van Bronkhorst, Eric (June 24, 2013). "The List: Top 5 architecture firms in the Puget Sound area (slide show)". Puget Sound Business Journal. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
^ "Design Firm of the Year', "Display and Design Ideas", September 2, 2008. ^{[dead link‍]}

Add topic

[1] ttp://emag.digitalpc.co.uk/cmpi/worldarch08.asp World Architecture 100 (Building Design), 2008

[2] "Top Green Design Firms 2008', "Engineering News-Record", June 23, 2008.

[3] Van Bronkhorst, Eric (June 24, 2013). "The List: Top 5 architecture firms in the Puget Sound area (slide show)". Puget Sound Business Journal. Retrieved February 21, 2016.

[4] "Design Firm of the Year', "Display and Design Ideas", September 2, 2008. ^{[dead link‍]}

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]