Talk:Callum Keith Rennie

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Hinnk in topic File:Frank's Cock (1993) 2.png

BSG?

edit

I'm not a great writer and thus do not want to make the change myself, but wouldn't it be fair to say that one of his more notable roles is that of Leoben on the reimagined Battlestar Galactica? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.233.85 (talk) 00:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC) i dont know why his appearance in the butterfly effect was left out of his filmography .small role i know but still relevant to his career. also im trying to find out if he is related to michael rennie the english actor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.138.149 (talk) 05:09, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

"He resides alternatively in Vancouver and Los Angeles."

edit

Does he pursue an alternative life-style in both Vancouver and Los Angeles, or does he reside alternately in Vancouver and Los Angeles?Jock123 (talk) 12:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Harper's Island

edit

Dear Harper's Island fans. I do understand that you are excited about this series, but please stop adding refereces to it in random places on this page. Harper's Island IS mentioned in the appropriate places (Career section, TV guest appearances). There is no need to add extra references in the introduction or the TV series section or any other place. There is no need to add episode recaps or charcater descriptions. Ftwhtwd (talk) 21:25, 3 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Canadian actor

edit

Not going into legal details of his nationality, there is a consensus that, even if Rennie's English origins are often mentioned - and acknowledged in this article - he's always referred to as a Canadian actor in articles or biographies, he often refers to himself as such in interviews, and he figures in NorthernStars, the Canadian Movie Database, one of many "projects designed to document and celebrate all things Canadian," and in the Canadian Film Encyclopedia. That is enough reference for me that he should be referred to as a Canadian actor. There is also this article mentioning "problems with the fact that Marciano was the only cast member that did not have Canadian citizenship", precising "Callum Keith Rennie, Jan Rubeš and Tony Craig are landed immigrants. Although American born and raised, Beau Starr has spent well over a decade living and working in Canada .../... As well, the "Due South" spin-off has often been referred to as having a 100% Canadian cast", at suite101.com/article.cfm/canadian_television/20399. In my opinion, any diverging assertion should be sustained.--Tsharkey (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Callum Keith Rennie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Callum Keith Rennie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Callum Keith Rennie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Callum Keith Rennie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Callum Keith Rennie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Frank's Cock (1993) 2.png

edit

@MikeAllen Could you clarify what your objection is to including File:Frank's Cock (1993) 2.png in the article? It's a lossless Full HD screenshot taken from the Vimeo copy; if this is about the blur and grain, those are faithful to the appearance of the original film, and the Frank's Cock article goes in detail explaining how and why the footage was rephotographed. I get that a low-budget low-fidelity film isn't going to capture the subject in detail, but I think it'd be a shame to let the style of an experimental film prevent us from including a good example of one of Rennie's early performances before becoming famous. hinnk (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why do we need a non free image when there is already a free (good) image of Callum. You need a good copyright rationale to include a non free image. There's only one sentence about the film in this article, maybe it should be on the Frank's Cock article. Mike Allen 12:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, was that still the issue? I figured it was the image itself, glad I asked. Much of the filmmaker's work is available under the {{CC0}} license, so we're able to use this image freely. No fair use involved. hinnk (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply