Talk:Calum Scott

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Ss112 in topic Redirects

Sexual orientation

edit

He just made an interview with the attitude and due the interview he is definitely not straight but honestly I can't find any explicit notion that he is either gay, bisexual, or queer so I can't add any material to the article. Can anyone help out or find other sources to explain explicitly about his sexual orientation? the interview :)Ladsgroupoverleg 06:42, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think "I would love to [be] like my mate and be open enough to chat to [with] guys and see where it goes" and "I’ve found myself in situations where people are talking to me about girlfriends and I’ve found myself skirting around the issue" are pretty unambiguously saying he's gay. However, he seems to be intentionally avoiding saying it ("...it’s difficult to talk about because you feel like you’re going to feel discriminated for it, me included.")
But the "A lot of people assume I’m straight" is reason enough to categorize him as LGBT, which is what I've done (Category:LGBT musicians from England and Category:LGBT singers). Good enough for now. It's not worth mentioning with a paragraph in the article until there's more to work with. Bruto (talk) 13:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Calum Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Calum Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Redirects

edit

Hi, @Ss112: Can you check both the redirects to see whether that's what you wanted?. Thanks. –Ammarpad (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Ammarpad: Yeah, it's fine. Thanks. Ss112 12:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply