Talk:Camargue

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fictional reference

edit

This mention of a fictional/fantasy future place called "Kamarg" doesn't seem to me to add any important or even real information about the Camargue. What does this contribute to understanding about the real Camargue? In general, the "popular culture" secions in a number of Wikipedia articles I work on seem to detract from the point of the article by just listing individuals' personal associations to things, and a number of editors are moving in the direction of taking out such things. Unless the editor who put this there can somehow write about the cultural and literary influence of the Camargue in a more encyclopedic mannter, this seems more like a sound bite or factoid rather than something adding knowledge or understanding, at least from my limited perspective. Jeremy J. Shapiro 06:54.

In response to your comment Jeremy, I would say that including the fictional reference of "Kamarg" is relevant. The Kamarg is the opening setting for one of Michael Moorcock's Eternal Champion series: "Hawkmoon". A quick perusal of the Camargue wiki clearly shows that it is the creative inspiration for Moorcock's Kamarg including the native fauna, locales (Aigues-Mortes), and geography. I doubt that many would contest the literary value of including a reference to Moorcock's works as he is recognized as an outstanding speculative fiction author and had contributed a significant body of work to the field of science and speculative fiction. A reader of Moorcock will see his influence throughout much of modern science fiction, fantasy, and speculative fiction in film, television, and print. 75.157.166.97 (talk) 22:28, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Kimball FiniganReply

More encyclopedic introduction

edit

Shouldn't the article start out by explaining what the Camargue is (as opposed to where it is), e.g. "The Camargue (blabla) is a wetlands region in Southern France (between bla bla etc.)"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.42.116.93 (talk) 12:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camargue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Camargue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply