Talk:Cambodia–China relations
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Cambodia–China relations appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 1,135 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Were Chinese deemed an undesirable group by the Khmer Rouge?
editI know that during Pol Pot's time many ethnic groups were targeted and many Chinese were killed. However were they a targeted group?76.14.57.76 (talk) 05:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Cambodia–China relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070616041520/http://www.jamestown.org:80/publications_details.php?volume_id=415&issue_id=3704&article_id=2371023 to http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=415&issue_id=3704&article_id=2371023
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
"Non-neutral language"
edit@Amigao: Why is this article's neutrality being disputed? Jarble (talk) 14:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know what Amigao had in mind, but sections like "Concerns" are usually not wise as they invite POV and SYNTH. I recommend working them material from this section into more neutral style headings. Not sure the article needs to be templated though. JArthur1984 (talk) 16:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)