Talk:Cambois

Latest comment: 4 years ago by DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered in topic Too much detail??
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cambois. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation request

edit

Any chance of a recording of the pronunciation please? Given the contrast between what it looks like to non-natives, and what the IPA suggests, I feel that it would be helpful and improve access. I can't do it myself – you would injure yourself falling off your chair laughing, and we do not want that. Best to all, DBaK (talk) 20:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Too much detail??

edit

At the moment we say: It was a coal mining village from 1862 to week ending 20 April 1968 when Cambois Colliery closed. Yes, I know we're an encyclopaedia but do we, or should we, really care about it being w/e 20/04/68 rather than just 1968? I don't have a strong position on this but I did think it read a little oddly ... what do you think? DBaK (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply