This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
If you Google "Cambridge Consultants" and select "news" there are bazillions of results in major tech publications covering innovations developed by Cambridge Consultants. It is not clear to me whether these help to establish "notability" or not, as the articles do not cover *the company* extensively but do cover the *technology developed*. To my mind this should help establish notability, but I am not sure if others agree. If they do, I can easily add many many more such cites - as it is I added a few (in the Innovations section) to give a flavour. Llamatronic (talk) 19:10, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Is notability indicated by the very large number of links in wikipedia articles to Cambridge Consultants which are now showing red?
A suitable reference showing the central role of Cambridge Consultants in the creation of Silicon Fen is the 1985 work 'The Cambridge Phenomenon' (Segal Quince Wickstead) (see https://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/SearchResults?isbn=9780951020203&cm_sp=mbc-_-ISBN-_-all ). It details that the majority of firms in the Cambridge tech cluster can be traced to Cambridge Consultants roots. I don't know the procedures for re-instating Cambridge Consultants as an article, and I don't want to do the wrong thing, but this does need to happen! Anyone able to assist? Thanks
