Talk:Cameroon at the 2002 Winter Olympics/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Going to review this article. MWright96 (talk) 10:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Background

• "The Cameroon Olympic and Sports Committee was recognized by" - recognised
• "a total of 2,399 athletes took part representing 77 National Olympic Committees." - a total of 2,399 representing 77 National Olympic Committees took part.

Cross-country skiing

• "About Cameroon, he said" - Menyoli said,
• "he was a competitor in the sprint, finishing the qualifying round in a time of 4 minutes and 10.07 seconds, only the top 16 could advance to the next round," - there needs to be a full stop after the qualifying round time to eliminate this run-on sentence
• "He finished the event in 65th place out of 69 classified finishers." - ended to avoid close reptition.

References

• Consider archiving Reference 3 like what you've done with the rest of the citations
• Reference 9 is missing the author which is located in the top part of the article

Decent work in putting into this article. Just the minor quibbles from yours truly. MWright96 (talk) 12:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

• Everything done, but the archiving. I can't get the tool to work right the last few days. Courcelles (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @Courcelles: Very well. Article is now at GA status. MWright96 (talk) 14:39, 16 August 2018 (UTC)