Talk:Camilo Cienfuegos

Latest comment: 11 hours ago by Beach00 in topic Validity of Death/ Mystery circumstances

early years

edit

In the article is said, that Cienfuegos' family fled Spain because of the Civil War. That war started in 1936. Does someone know how Cienfuegos, who was born in 1932, could be born in Havana, four years before the war? Was it maybe a foster family? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.135.70.247 (talk) 08:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The family left Spain before the civil war. Camilo was born in Lawton La Habana in 1932 and his parents were his natural parents. Clearly there's a mistake as to when exactly his parents left Spain. Mickavellian (talk) 01:18, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camilo Cienfuegos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Camilo Cienfuegos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Blue Rider (talk · contribs) 19:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Hello! Good to see a WP:VA biography being brought to GA status. I will try to post my first review until the end of this week. Thank you! The Blue Rider   19:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much for taking this one! This is my fourth vital GA nomination. I'll be away over the weekend, so I'll probably get around to addressing your comments some time next week. --Grnrchst (talk) 10:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@The Blue Rider: Thanks for the review. I'm going to need a few more days to get around to addressing your comments, as I've come down with something during my time away. Once I've recovered, I'll get right to it. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit
  • "in some cases even being considered second only to Fidel himself" contradicts him being "widely considered second only to Fidel Castro".
  • Removed "widely" to be safe. To be clear, the source in this case says he "bid fair to become almost as popular as Castro himself and was "the man best loved in Cuba after Castro". Let me know if you think this can be improved further. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Per MOS:LEADLENGTH, it is reccomended that leads have 3 or 4 paragraphs, so I would suggest merging the first paragraph with the second.

Early life

edit
  • What type of illegal work did Camilo?
  • Why/How did he join Fidel Castro's movement?

Guerrilla activities

edit

Landing and first offensive

edit

In Guevara's Column

edit
  • Substitute Sierra Maestra with region, in "over the region" and then start the next sentence with region.
  • The armed groups are the revolutinaries, the national army or both? I also take issue with how the word anarchy is being used, I understand that its popular meaning is being used here but maybe substitute it with chaos.
  • Remove the wikilink to vanguard since it will be linked in the above section.
  • Add a Wikitionary link to "devil-may-care" since it's not a common expression.

Independent command

edit
  • Since Fulgencio Batista was only mentioned once in the Early life section add the first name in his first mention of this section.

Las Villas Operation

edit
  • Put the province name in Trinidad, since people might associate the town with the island, Trinidad, instead.

Revolutionary victory

edit
  • Do you think that Camp Columbia (Havana) merits a redlink?
  • Added. Thankfully this note made me realised I had unconsciously hispanisied the name to "Colombia", but all the sources use the spelling "Columbia" because the base was originally established by the Americans during the first occupation of Cuba. Glad I caught this. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a Wikitionary link to "en-masse".

After the Revolution

edit

Initial activities

edit
  • Put the PSP acronym in paranthesis in the first instance of Popular Socialist Party of the section.
  • The economic meaning of austerity isn't being used here, so remove the wikilink.

Consolidation of the Revolution

edit
  • All good here.

Huber Matos affair

edit
  • Why were the officers worried by the Castro's regime?
  • "Castro's consolidation of power, as well as the increasing role of the Popular Socialist Party in government, began to worry some officers in the Revolutionary Army" Is this not clear enough? I thought it was pretty obvious. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Disappearance

edit
  • All good here.

Character

edit

Personality

edit
  • Was Cienfuegos gay/bisexual? If so, clarify that since two quotes describe him as gay and other as having a love of women.
  • This sections relies too much on quotations, try to rephrase it.
  • I've been looking at this section for a few days now and I'm still struggling with how I could rephrase it. These are all such subjective views of his personality that I'm not sure how I could possibly neutralise them into wikivoice. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Political ideology

edit
  • All good here.

Leadership style

edit
  • This section relies too much on quotations, try to rephrase them.
  • The quotations here and in the personality section were two places where I felt it very difficult to put it into wikivoice, because these reflections almost always come from personal perspectives. I can give it a go, but I already struggled with it in the first place. --Grnrchst (talk) 16:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Legacy

edit

Speculation about disappearance

edit
  • All good here.

Friends and family

edit
  • All good here.

Memorial dedications

edit
edit
  • This section seems to be lacking for a highly popular figure, isn't there more pop culture depictions of him?

Image(s)

edit
  • All images are correctly tagged and have suitable captions, pass!

Stability

edit
  • Some reverts here and there but overall stable, pass!

Sources

edit
  • All source numbers are from this version. Checked sources 1, 2, 3, 9, 21, 23, 41, 48, 58, 103, 117, 118, 191 and 233.
  • Source 1 is no longer available.
  • Source 9, especifically Quirk, says some run away to the mountains and other to the south, the text only has the former.

Copyvio

edit
  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector points to 10,7% due to some partially copied sentences, I suggest them to be rephrased.

Infobox

edit
  • Infobox seems fine.
No, everything is in order! Good job on the article. You are missed at WP:VA! The Blue Rider   02:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Camilo Cienfuegos (left) watching Fidel Castro (right) speak after the victory of the Cuban Revolution
Improved to Good Article status by Grnrchst (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 32 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Grnrchst (talk) 13:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC).Reply

  •   Wow, what a great article. It does an excellent job of describing its complex subject and its context, is impartial, and detailed to a fault. It is a recent GA, QPQs are done, hooks are in the article and referenced; it is hard to pick one, but if pressed I'd go with ALT4, because I feel it represents his character best. Constantine 19:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Validity of Death/ Mystery circumstances

edit

There was never physical evidence of the Cessna crashing. However unlikely, his death or the existence of his purported Cessna have never been confirmed by recovered wreckage, or third party government intelligence agencies such as the United States. This makes Camilo Cienfuegos a unique figure outside of the revolutionary realm but also within the unsolved mysteries subjects. This could simply correspond to Cuban government sabotage against him. Nonetheless, as Camilo was born in 1932 he could still be alive and well today so please do not change presumed dates or ages. Beach00 (talk) 05:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)Reply