Talk:Campaign for the neologism "santorum"

Latest comment: 1 year ago by .usarnamechoice in topic removal of two maintenance templates
Former good article nomineeCampaign for the neologism "santorum" was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 19, 2006Articles for deletionKept
December 25, 2006Articles for deletionNo consensus
October 2, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
October 23, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
December 19, 2010Articles for deletionKept
June 12, 2011Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
June 20, 2011Articles for deletionKept
June 21, 2011Deletion reviewEndorsed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Renamed to Campaign for the neologism "santorum"

edit

I've now renamed this article from 'Campaign for "santorum" neologism' to 'Campaign for the neologism "santorum"'. My rationale is that the latter is idiomatic grammatical English, while the former is a journalese contraction for the same thing which reads awkwardly. -- The Anome (talk) 21:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't the title be Spreading Santorum, since that's the actual name of the campaign? The Dutch Wikipedia has the title that way, and it seems like the most reasonable article title for this. פֿינצטערניש (talk) 10:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

removal of two maintenance templates

edit

i removed template:lead rewrite and template:lead extra info because the lead looks fine, and i dont see extra info in the lead that is not included lower down within the body of the article. also spreadingsantorum.com is dead so i marked it as a deadlink. .usarnamechoice (talk) 00:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply