Talk:Campbell v MGN Ltd
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Thincat in topic Strange commentary
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Strange commentary
editI have removed a whole bunch of text in a subsection "three step test" which was substantively added here It simply doesn't seem to have much (or any) relationship to the "Lords Decision" at http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2004/22.html which it seems is the purported source. If I am mistaken or the source is elsewhere, please see to things. I have also removed some unreferenced remarks substantively added here and some other (quite possibly accurate) unsourced comment. Thincat (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)