Talk:Camps Bay

Latest comment: 9 years ago by DMacks in topic Sourcing problems

Copyvio

edit

This has been reported as a copyvio. However, it should certainly be rewritten as a legitimate article. Capitalistroadster 10:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Turns out it wasn't a copyvio; see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 May 20/Articles. Melchoir 10:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

The website encyclopedia.vestigatio is a clone of wikipedia so if this article is in violation then so is Cape Town, Durban, Johannesburg, plus most of wikipedia. Please remove copyright infringement tag and do your research thougherly before putting your foot into your mouth. --Jcw69 10:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I did my research properly. The text is also copied from [1]--Da legend 10:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I see. 64.169.241.50 copied in the offending material; I've now removed it. We don't need a copyvio notice unless the entire article and its history consists of violations. Melchoir 10:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
By the way, my source: Wikipedia:Copyright#If you find a copyright infringement. Melchoir 10:49, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thank you very much--Da legend 10:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
No prob, thanks for bringing it up! Melchoir 10:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing problems

edit

I agree with the recent removal of the multiple tags for content problems (I fixed a bit of remaining non-neutral wording). But there is a serious lack of sourcing. The only cited content is the census data. There are claims of history, claims of facilities, claims of interest/popularity, zero cites for any. Someone with knowledge of this place, please fix this mess so it doesn't have to get stubbed down for failing WP:V policy. DMacks (talk) 02:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply