Talk:Camulodunum

Camulodumum?

Resolved

 – Article is no longer at that name.

Who calls it Camulodumum (with an 'm' rather than an 'n')? I've never heard that before. Citation please!

-- Tom Anderson 2007-05-08 18:03 +0100 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.40.81.27 (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC).

Camelot

The fact that this is almost certainly the source of the name "Camelot" seem to beg mention here. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 06:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Find a source and put it in the article. Nev1 (talk) 16:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Added a section on it. Probably needs citation but I struggle to find exact sources, the link to Camelot is all just speculative anyway. Common and notable enough to justify a section though, I believe. Twelvetoner (talk) 21:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Rewrite

Hello. I've rewritten much of the article, complete with references, over the past few days to try and give more info on the town during its high point and flesh out its history. For such an important part of Britain's Roman past, the old article was very scanty and seemed to imply that the town ended with Boudica, and then turned into Camelot...

Please add more info if you can and more pictures!

Razumukhin (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Fenwick treasure

This major find surely needs a mention: http://www.thecolchesterarchaeologist.co.uk/?p=14844 John a s (talk) 23:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

I've added a little bit to the Boudican destruction layer section. Please feel free to add more! Razumukhin (talk) 17:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I look forward to seeing the treasure in a museum one day. John a s (talk) 21:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

venus statue?

In the "walls" section you mention that a venus statuette was found in 1872-73 that may have been part of the temples. Was it by any chance THIS statuette found in 1870, and now at the British Museum? http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1394346&partId=1&searchText=diadem&images=true&object=20526&subject=54324&page=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Florimell1919 (talk • contribs) 06:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, yep that's the one! Razumukhin (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camulodunum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140603222036/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/colchester_temples.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/colchester_temples.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camulodunum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924114318/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/stanway.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/stanway.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cat.essex.ac.uk/reports/CAR-report-0008

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Coin pictures

The coin image entitled 'Coin of the Trinovantes minted at Camulodunon' may have an incomplete and potentially misleading caption. The coin bears the letters CVN which is the usual shorthand for King Cunobelin. This, in turn, means that the coin would not belong to the early Trinovantes period of Camulodunon (25-10 BC) as appears implied by the article text at this point, but to Cunobelin's reign (c. AD 9-40). A numismatist should check this out, and if necessary, clarify it with an unambiguous caption. Klumpenburg (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Separate Iron age article

jhjhfee Troopersho (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)