Talk:Camus Cross/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Catfish Jim and the soapdish in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ealdgyth - Talk 14:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I'll be reviewing this article shortly. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    need page numbers or links to pages for a couple of citations
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
General comments:
  • The Allen & Anderson ref needs a page number
  • Kindly spell out abbreviations such as HMSO in the refs, not everyone is going to know it means "Her/His Majesties Stationary Office".
  • Likewise, need a page number for the Walker and Maule refs
  • What is the Commissary Maule? Do we have an article on this?
  • Link for Downie Hills?
  • Just those few things above, and it's good to go. I took the liberty of copyediting as I reviewed.
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Reply