Talk:CanJet Flight 918
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A summary of this article appears in CanJet. |
A summary of this article appears in Sangster International Airport. |
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 20 April 2009. |
![]() | It is requested that a vehicle diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Jamaica may be able to help! |
redirects
editCanjet flight 918, CanJet flight 918, Canjet Flight 918, CanJet 918, Canjet 918, C6 918, C6 flight 918, CJA 918, CJA918, CJA flight 918, C6 Flight 918, CJA Flight 918, CANJET 918, CANJET918, CANJET Flight 918, CANJET flight 918, C-FTCZ should redirect here. (using various capitalizations, ICAO, IATA, and CALLSIGN designations) 70.29.213.241 (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for that fairly comprehensive list. The "various capitalizations, ICAO, IATA, and CALLSIGN designations" can be done by others. --candle•wicke 13:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Sure thing. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Stephen Fray (hijacker's name) should redirect here. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Deletion
editHijackings are not automatically notable. This one involved no injuries, and was concluded without major incident. WP is Notnews. Any security issues should be able to be covered on the airport's page. I am preparing to take this to AFD, but it will take me a few hours to get to it. I won't be offended if someone beats me to it! :) - BillCJ (talk) 15:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- If you got rid of this article, you'd still need to merge it to the airline and airport articles, which would result in needing to keep this article around for page history. 70.29.213.241 (talk) 15:33, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- That's administrative - has nothing to do with AFD as such - the closing admin would determine that. - BillCJ (talk) 15:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I wondered how long it would take for someone to propose deleting it. As it involves a hijacking, it is notable enough to have an article according to WP:AIRCRASH criteria:-
- Air carrier criteria:
- It is the result of military or terrorist action, including hijacking, against a civilian target.
- It is the first, deadliest, or most significant accident for a particular airline or aircraft may also apply.
- Air carrier criteria:
- Mjroots (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- So now a twenty-year-old man with apparent mental problems is a terrorist? Hmmm. - BillCJ (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- A twenty-year-old man with a gun who holds crew hostage onboard an airliner certainly is! Mjroots (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- The guideline states "military or terrorist action", which to me implies an organized action of some kind by a group, or at least someone acting with or for a terroist or military group. Anyway, I can see I'm peeing in the wind here. I'll wait see if I have any support from some other users for an AFD before I spend an hour trying to file it. Btw, if he's a terrorist, that needs to be stated in the article. - BillCJ (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Really? Is that not a bit POVish? He might not be a terrorist from every angle. --candle•wicke 18:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- The guideline states "military or terrorist action", which to me implies an organized action of some kind by a group, or at least someone acting with or for a terroist or military group. Anyway, I can see I'm peeing in the wind here. I'll wait see if I have any support from some other users for an AFD before I spend an hour trying to file it. Btw, if he's a terrorist, that needs to be stated in the article. - BillCJ (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- As the first ever hijacking on Jamaican soil, I'd say that notability is firmly established. Mjroots (talk) 08:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
(Unindent) If that's been confirmed, then I'd agree, as would the actions by the JDF, though it was originally reported aas being the JCF (police). But he's still not a terrorist, ar leaast in the nomative definition of the word. - BillCJ (talk)
Jamaica Defence Force Counter Terrorism Operations Group
editAccording to [1] the CTOG was trained by Canadians. According to [2] they were advised during the situation by the FBI. 76.66.196.218 (talk) 16:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
crew
edit- Capt. James Murphy [4] of Halifax [5]
- First Officer Glenn Johnson [6] of Montreal [7]
- Flight Attendant Heidi Tofflemire [8] of Halifax
- Flight Attendant Nicole Rogers [9] of Halifax
- Flight Attendant Anu Goswami [10] of Toronto
- Flight Attendant Tony Bettencourt [11] of Toronto
- Flight Attendant Carolina Santizo Arriola [12] of Toronto
- Air security officer Garry Knickle [13] of Halifax
Stephen Fray
edit[14] of the Albion affluent neighbourhood, from the prestigious Cornwall College (high school), graduated Montego Bay Community College, from a well-known family.
Assessment
editComplete at least one projects B-class review before rating the article. Certain projects are automatically assessed remaining as start class on the pagePetebutt (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on CanJet Flight 918. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090424133707/http://www.jamaicaobserver.com:80/news/html/20090420T200000-0500_149859_OBS_SANDALS_OFFERS_ONE_WEEK_HOLIDAY_TO_CANJET_PASSENGERS__CREW.asp to http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/html/20090420T200000-0500_149859_OBS_SANDALS_OFFERS_ONE_WEEK_HOLIDAY_TO_CANJET_PASSENGERS__CREW.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:10, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on CanJet Flight 918. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080101022131/http://www.canjet.com:80/en_travel_advisory.aspx?ID=21 to http://www.canjet.com/en_travel_advisory.aspx?ID=21
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on CanJet Flight 918. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421112215/http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090420/plane_canada_090420/20090420?hub=TopStories to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090420/plane_canada_090420/20090420?hub=TopStories
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090425061205/http://www.ctv.ca:80/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090420/airport_security_090420?s_name=&no_ads= to http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090420/airport_security_090420?s_name=&no_ads=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)