Talk:Canadian Biodiversity Information Network

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

{{helpme}}

tell me if this information network established under the united nations convention on biological diversity is not notable enough to have its own entry, if not it can be a link to a resource under other topics, input welcome

i can try to find out more history of the resource...

Unfortunately, it is hard to verify notability due to the fact you have few external reliable sources GDonato (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

hmm there aren't a lot of people out there publishing research on the CBIN resource. after a short review, it looks like external authors are more likely to cite CBIN in *their* list of references. it seems a bit circular, but is CBIN's notability in fact supported by its use as a reference in published discussion of the united nations convention on biological diversity?

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Canadian Biodiversity Information Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)Reply