Talk:Canadian diamonds

Latest comment: 3 months ago by RenaisSanceSC2 in topic Management of Diamonds section - ChatGPT generated?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2019 and 17 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Louiseriou.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

environmental impacts

edit

added a sub-heading of wildlife that are impacted during diamond mining included: - caribou impact - grizzly bear impact - impacts on aquatic producers and consumers

added a sub-heading which talked about lake health included impacts such as: - chemistry - biota - lake structure

--Louiseriou (talk) 23:48, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

environmental assessment

edit

included the two environmental assessment used for diamond mining: - triple bottom line approach - five capital approach

--Louiseriou (talk) 23:49, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Numerous issues

edit

This article has numerous issues in grammar, punctuation, syntax, and general sentence/paragraph structure. It needs a close editing for those issues. DesertSkies120 (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lacks info

edit

who buys canadian diamonds? 65.95.182.149 (talk) 19:03, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree, it'd be great to have more information added about the profitability and the market for Canadian diamonds -TheBigPurplePeopleEater (talk) 03:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Management of Diamonds section - ChatGPT generated?

edit

This section appears to be a verbatim copy-paste of an LLM response. It has information redundant to the larger article, a list of subtopics in standard LLM formatting, and a closing paragraph that begins with "It's important to note that". Additionally, nothing is cited.

Is it worth attempting to save this section via extensive editing and citing? Should it simply be removed? It certainly doesn't belong as a subheading under the "Lake Health" section. RenaisSanceSC2 (talk) 22:57, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply