Talk:Canadian peacekeeping/GA1

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Nikkimaria in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk · contribs) 21:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • The lead is on the long side given the article's length
  Fixed I believe ...a few sentences removed.Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "for the common good of all the world's nations and not just its allies". When referring to countries or nations, referring to the world is redundant
  Fixed Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "approximately 130 Canadians having given their lives" - see MOS:EUPH. Ditto "loss of life"
  Fixed Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Er, looks like this is still there? Nikkimaria (talk) 04:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
sorry my bad.... I think it was there twice or I copying and pasted it back over.Moxy🍁 05:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "Approximately 130 Canadians having given their lives during peacekeeping operations (123 in UN missions)." - not a complete sentence. The article would benefit from a thorough copy-editing
  Fixed Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "Military observers, commanded by Lieutenant-General E.L.M. Burns". Given that the listing is from 1948 to present, this is potentially confusing - suggest clarifying, and doing the same for other similar entries.
  Removed..having reasl trouble finding all commanders...some say 7 some say 10 others say 11...so will simply let sources cover this by each mission.Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • Not a big fan of the organization of the article - the lead section is meant to serve as an overview, so having a separate Overview section doesn't make a lot of sense. One possible division would be History, Operations, and Recognition.
  Fixed I believe Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • "being looked upon to find a solution" - why?
  Fixed..reworded Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • The only significant controversy mentioned is Somalia. The article would be more balanced with discussion of other controversies, such as Rwanda, or critiques of its general approach
  Fixed Moxy🍁 06:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
  FixedMoxy🍁 17:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think the main remaining issue here is article structure - the organization remains a bit unclear for me. For example, how is the material being divided into Peace operations vs Participation - what goes in one section and what goes in the other? Nikkimaria (talk) 00:22, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I invite you or anyone to edit the structure that best serves our readers. Should we merger the sections?...i am up to whatever you think is best. Moxy🍁 00:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok got an emal about structure .- info moved around....see what you think..@Nikkimaria:. Moxy🍁 07:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think that's reasonable. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply