Talk:Canaletto

Latest comment: 2 years ago by BjKa in topic "Works"
Former good articleCanaletto was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 12, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Untitled

edit

I dislike one phrase in the lead - "They served as the equivalent of painted postcards for those able to afford the price." I can't understand how Canaletto's vast canvases may be compared to postcards. Should we remove this? --Ghirla | talk 18:03, 23 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Birthdate correction

edit

I am pretty sure that the correct day of birth is October 18, not October 7. FlyPanAma 04:44, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Stonemason's Yard dates

edit

Just to confirm something: the caption for this image says that it was painted between 1726 and 1730, but this source says that it was painted between 1727 and 1728. Which source should I trust? happyangrysad 20:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.150.84.225 (talk) Reply

New article - list of paintings

edit

I think we could split this article and make one dedicated to a list of Canaletto's paintings. There are about 200 known Canaletto paintings (over 50 only in the Royal Collection), so I don't think a list within the artist's main article is a good idea. (Felipeml (talk) 22:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC))Reply

We could, but why? If this article were longer I would be more enthusiastic. The list is more complete than many, though missing the dozen or so at Woburn Abbey, & many in Italy and France. Johnbod (talk) 02:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
I agree, a list attempting completeness should be split off from the main article, it is unwieldly in the context of the text and pictures, and it feels like scrolling through a desert going down to the bottom. Maybe the article could have a shortened list of his most celebrated paintings. Curiocurio (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I agree with the above that it's worth splitting out the list. It is quite lengthy scrolling through all the images--which while beautiful are slightly repetitive when seen in this context. A separate article would make sense. I'd do this split myself, but I'm not too familiar with unmerging pages etc... Sportzak (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Venetian versus Italian

edit

The issue of whether to group all painters in the Italian peninsula, south of the Alps under the label of Italian has been thoroughly discussed before. I get it. There was no "Italy" as a country in Canaletto's time. He would have thought of himself as a Venetian. But for me, Italy is an umbrella term. And as I have argued before, the main encyclopedic overviews of art south of the Alps from the 19th and 20th century use the term Italian to group painters including Canaletto. Someday, this may change in the future. But until then, I still maintain the Italian label.

See:

Rococo1700 (talk) 20:03, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canaletto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canaletto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Works"

edit

This table badly needs to be moved to List of paintings by Canaletto. Johnbod (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Seconded, and   Done --BjKa (talk) 09:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply