Talk:Canon EOS C300

Merge?

Merge with Canon EOS C300? Since it's the official name it seems to make sense to title the page "Canon EOS C300", with "Canon C300" redirecting to it. — Filmcom (talk) 18:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Why did't you re-merge it with Canon EOS C300 right away? --Dmitry _{(talk•contibs)} 07:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I wasn't sure how to go about it at the time... — Filmcom (talk) 11:59, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Move to Canon EOS C300

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved and old history merged. -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Canon C300 → Canon EOS C300 – Official name used by the manufacturer, aligns with naming conventions for other Canon EOS cameras. Current redirect is a result of a poorly considered merge. Dmitry _{(talk•contibs)} 07:07, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

• Support — It makes sense to be consistent with the camera's official name and other articles on Canon EOS cameras. — Filmcom (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
• Comment why don't you just unredirect the other page, and merge it the other way? Either way, both pages need to exist for history attribution. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 03:31, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Regular users can only move the page over a redirect with an empty edit history. What you propose is a cut-and-paste move which should be avoided. --Dmitry _{(talk•contibs)} 08:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Resolution

Is it Full HD or 4k? Both are stated in the article. Thanks. Maikel (talk) 21:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Solved. Maikel (talk) 22:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)