Talk:Canyon de Chelly National Monument
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edit fragment
editThe following edit was moved here for discussion and rewording. WBardwin 00:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Other Less known ruins are around the area. One of the most prominent is the Three Turkey Ruins. It was built by the Anasazi to protect themselves from rival tribes. It is about a 2 hour horse ride down and back up, depending on where you go back up. It is completely on Navajo Land and you must have a navajo guide. One of the best ways to see the ruins is to go to Totsonii Ranch and they will take you down there for a fee and if you make a reservation ahead of time.
==
editComment: The red dot for Canyon de Chelly on the locator map on the page for the Monument is located over in eastern Arkansas!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.251.17.176 (talk) 17:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Is monument canyon the same as Monument Valley?
editdm (talk) 02:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- not at all; monument canyon is in the Canyon de Chelly National Monument, south east of Spider Rock (see [1]), Monument Valley is something totally different. --Ajnem (talk) 12:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Archaeological and geological information needed
editThe article is missing information pertaining to the geology, archeology and history of the so called Canyon de Chelly National Moument. There is nothing here about the numerous cliff ruins (eg Casa Blanca aka White House) and excavations conducted within the park boundaries. There are some old gooks eg Annual report of the Bureau of American ..., Volume 16, Parts 1894-1895 by Smithsonian http://books.google.com/books?id=UUsSAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA146&dq=white+house+ruin+canyon+de+chelly&hl=en&ei=e6CcTs7kJ-rp0QHPhoCJCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CD8Q6AEwAA#v=twopage&q&f=false and I am sure there are newer ones too - — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarioTW (talk • contribs) 21:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- perhaps this entry, i.e. Canyon de Chelly, is a case-in-point of how National Park Service, with its limited funding and short-staffed, is unable or unwilling to engage in professional archaeological excavations within its jurisdictions, depraving us of knowledge regarding the prehistory of these sites - see this book A new deal for southeastern archaeology by Edwin A. Lyon http://books.google.com/books?id=M7B6iUbiL-kC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarioTW (talk • contribs) 22:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- Your comment is a complete misunderstanding of the NPS's status here. This is part of the Navajo reservation and is a living community. It is their land, and no one has the right to excavate here. They aren't exactly happy with the NPS running it in any case, as they feel they should be able to do that themselves. Dougweller (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Major gaps in article
edit1. Its fascinating history.
2. A discussion of the community that lives there today. You could easily miss the scant mention of the canyon community.
I have the resources to do this, let's see if I have the time. Dougweller (talk) 05:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Canyon de Chelly National Monument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629022806/http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/nps/nps/part2.htm to http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/nps/nps/part2.htm#cach
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.nps.gov/cach/planyourvisit/upload/Planning-Your-Visit-2012.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613200207/http://www.nature.nps.gov/geology/parks/cach/index.cfm to http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/parks/cach/index.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Red location dot
editBUT the link to the enlarged map https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Usa_edcp_relief_location_map.png does not show any red dot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.216.245 (talk • contribs) 12:32, 2017 December 30 (UTC)
- The linked enlarged map is the base map that is used to show locations in thousands of articles in tens of Wikipedias. Your point is good that readers may expect the linked enlarged map to show the location dot. Please consider submitting a feature request at Wikipedia:Bug reports and feature requests. Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:27, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Etymology Sources
editAs of 27 Jul 2023 there's a maintenance tag for citations for the Etymology section. I was able to find a couple of sources that confirm the first part of what had been written. I have been unable to find any others to support the rest of the paragraph, however. I will reach out to the NPS to see if someone at the NM can assist, but I did not feel that removing the tag was appropriate as most of the section can still use citations. OneEarDrummer (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)