Talk:Cape Fear shiner

Weird derivation...

OK, opening up my trusty lexicon we have...mekistos/μηκιστος - 'longest/tallest' or 'very long' (a superlative from mēkos/μηκος - length) and...cholas/χολας 'intestines' or 'bile' (?!) cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Ahaaaaa - just read the article. very funny cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

GA review

I've signed up to review this, I've a busy week or two coming up what with Christmas etc, but I'll do asap. Jimfbleak (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

First quick read through. Obviously not much needed here, but two first thoughts.

1. Many of the sentences are single clause, and the short sentences make for less than flowing reading, especially in the description section, where almost every characteristic seems to have its own sentence
2. pharyngeal teeth needs a gloss - I'm not sure what it means without looking it up, and I've a scientific background

Jimfbleak (talk) 16:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I've worked on sentence structure a bit in the lead and description sections. I've also added a definition for pharyngeal teeth into the article. Are there any other improvements that can be made? Oh, and thanks for taking on the article so swiftly after it was posted. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Good Article nomination

I've been through the emended version, just minor tweaks like fixing repeated phrases, rolling up short sentences, and trying to improve the readability in a couple of places: formal assessment

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

well done, Jimfbleak (talk) 07:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Assessment

Assessed mid-importance for WikiProject Fishes because of conservation status. Neil916 (Talk) 08:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cape Fear shiner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051228010751/http://fwie.fw.vt.edu:80/WWW/esis/lists/e254016.htm to http://fwie.fw.vt.edu/WWW/esis/lists/e254016.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cape Fear shiner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080724025922/http://raleighaquariumsociety.org/newsletter/2007/aug2007.pdf to http://raleighaquariumsociety.org/newsletter/2007/aug2007.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-06042006-143746/unrestricted/etd.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071216045427/http://www.nczoo.org/conservationresearch/instate_capefearshiner.cfm to http://www.nczoo.org/conservationresearch/instate_capefearshiner.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)