Talk:Cape May County, New Jersey/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dolotta (talk · contribs) 14:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

I'll take a stab at reviewing this article. -- Dolotta (talk) 14:00, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I know it's a long article. I intend to take this to FAC, so I appreciate the first review. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

In the Municipalities section, what are your thoughts on linking to an appropriate article for each municipality type like Borough (New Jersey) for example. -- Dolotta (talk) 12:37, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

It is already linked previously in the article. Due to the sorting in the table, every munitipality type would have to be linked, and I'm not a fan of overlinking. Make sure the article is accessible, but not too complex, or people could get off the page by accident (if they made it that far in the page (no offense to any readers out there who happened to read the article - thank you for reading about this county! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Que the Homer Simpson doh slap. I forgot about the sorting feature. You are quite right. -- Dolotta (talk) 01:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink: I will throw this out for comments from anyone else for the next day or two and will look forward to promoting if all goes well. -- Dolotta (talk) 01:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Looks like a Good Article to me. Congrats!