Talk:Cape Schanck
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suburb
editIs it accurate to call Cape Schanck a suburb? I thought it was a town. (Melbourne suburban sprawl hasn't made it that far yet, has it?) -- Kevin Ryde 23:32, 12 February 2006 (UTC).
- Definitely not a suburb of Melbourne. Questionable whether it even qualifies as a town. It's just a coastal community of homes at "The Schanck". Rob Clark —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.166.10.34 (talk • contribs) 17 October 2006
- As it is part of the Shire of Mornington Peninsula, it is within the Melbourne Statistical Area. I don't think it's accurate to call it a suburb (ABS doesn't try to), but it is a locality of Melbourne as far as the ABS are concerned, nonetheless. Orderinchaos78 15:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cape Schanck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5wNhWF4B7?url=http://www.anps.org.au/documents/VIC_coastal.pdf to http://www.anps.org.au/documents/VIC_coastal.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120416084314/http://www.capeschancklighthouse.com.au:80/ to http://www.capeschancklighthouse.com.au/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 14 November 2016 (UTC)