Talk:Capital Airlines Flight 67

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 95.150.18.158 in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

The 'official' version has a great deal of statistical support. The Viscount was designed to be stall resistant by making the horizontal stabilizer designed to stall before the wing - causing a pitch down. A number of other Viscount accidents were attributed to horizontal stabilizer icing causing a pitch down.

The aircraft impacted in an attitude consistent with this and not in one caused by an accelerated stall which would have manifested itself as a roll rate before impact.

Hull's crash was the first CAB accident report I ever read at the age of 8. I think the line suggesting that the accident was caused by a descending turn be amended as the 'official' cause fits the circumstances. Mark Lincoln (talk) 00:06, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Several Viscount accidents were due to the crews not turning on the anti-icing in conditions that required it, and in wrongly delaying engine re-starting as-per airline check lists that incorrectly advised a maximum height for re-starting, when the Dart engines could in fact be successfully re-started at any height. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.18.158 (talk) 11:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capital Airlines Flight 67. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply