Talk:Capital punishment/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Make the list prose, however, these are still okay, but I will say no.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Requires more citations in sections "History" and "Movements towards humane execution."

   C. No original research:

   Questionable in the "Global distribution" to name one.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Definitely one the better parts of this article.

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Broad range of views.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   Seems to have a history of vandalism...

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   I would recommend adding an image in the lead section.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I recommend fixing what I said needs to be fixed. This is making more prose and more references please. Obviously, the stable-ness of article can't be change because it is about such a controversial topic. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 23:18, 29 April 2009 (UTC)