Talk:Captain D's

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2600:1702:3AE0:4760:B4C1:743D:98AE:C94D in topic Shoney's

WP:FOOD Tagging

edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shoney's

edit

The article mentions Shoney's several times, but never comes right out and makes a connection like "Shoney's owned Captain D's" or anything like that. Either a reason for including information about Shoney's should be included, or the references to it should be removed.72.197.227.204 (talk) 02:27, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

How about this article from 1995 which explicitly said Shoney's is NOT selling its Captain D's chain?

https://apnews.com/2ade28fa11ba4f159aef629a40e9d5ca

There's also this article from the NYT which specifically states "Shoney's owns Captain D's" https://www.nytimes.com/1984/06/08/business/graph-of-shoney-s-net-income-since-1974-at-shoney-s-details-count.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:3AE0:4760:B4C1:743D:98AE:C94D (talk) 14:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Shoney's needs to be added back to the history since they were the original owner of Captain D's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:3AE0:4760:B4C1:743D:98AE:C94D (talk) 14:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Captain D's ad campaign

edit

Captain D's is running an ad campaign about theories of who Captain D really was. However, Captain D's transient ad campaigns are not notable. Not to mention silly. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 03:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Captain D's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits

edit

Recent edits have added content that is very much a close paraphrasing of a copyrighted source http://www.captainds.com/our-story/our-history/ (see Copyvio tool). Even though the tool gives a 26.5% results, a close look at the content in common is troubling. The added content should instead be put into the editor's own words. Shearonink (talk) 03:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply