Talk:Car donation

Untitled

From VfD:

When I came upon this, it had a vfd tag, and had been listed here, but no rationale. I've since rewritten the article, and vote keep. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:17, 2004 Jul 20 (UTC)

• Keep: The original version implied it was an advert for a company buying 2nd hand cars Giano 16:23, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Keep the present article as explanatory rather than promotional. Geogre 16:28, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. An interesting curiosity of the US charity system. Nice job on the rewrite. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 16:31, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Keep rewrite. Good job. - Lucky 6.9 16:56, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Keep. jengod 18:24, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
• Excellent rewrite :). Keep. Thue | talk 09:32, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Keep, excellent rewrite. Andris 11:52, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

---

I suggest we remove the line "as such, this type of giving has become very popular in the early 21st century," or at least the "in the early 21st century" portion. This type of donation existed before the year 2000 (I donated cars in 1994 and again in 1994), and I'm not aware of any such measurement of popularity, let alone how noting popularity adds to the article. --michael zimmer 04:54, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

---

There are 8 links now in the External Links section. Car donation is in the wikipedia spam category, and I see why. The first external links is a true resource. All other 7 external links are spam.

2nd link: Links to page with poor content - page dominated by Paid Ads.

3rd link: Does not provide any usefull info. Has google ads - In the end of the page, Other Usefull Sites refer you to credit guides and home loans.

4th link: This site is a duplicate of the second link – same layout exactly – just a diferent URL with google ads are in a different spot.

5th link: Adsense – Google paid ads

6th link: DO not have ANY resource or links to other blind sites. It only has links to Adsense.

7th link:Is a one page site with no tips – it only has Adsense ads – with Google paid ads.

8th link:A car donation site advertising themselves.

I suggest all 7 links to be removed.--mp 17:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

---

The new “external link” just added claims to be “charity-neutral” – however, it is full of Google Ads.

Click on “view charities that benefit animals” – you will see Google Ads about: Pet Adoption, Adopt a Shelter Cat Month, etc.

Click on “Donation by Location – Atlanta”: you will see Google Ads on: Car Donation Washington , etc.

--mp 18:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Google ads arent bad - they help support a website --joeychgo

I do not think it is appropriate for an encyclopedia to call such a site a “car donation directory that is charity-neutral”.

Top fold of the home page is dominated by paid ads.

--mp 15:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

This is a topic that gets very consistently spammed. Per WP:EL I'd say only something that serves as a very high quality link that is either noncommercial or the ads are very unobtrusive and the quality is very high should be included. Just keep removing the crud. If someone disagrees they can start a discussion on the talk page on why the link is worth including. But even those need to be culled to avoid SEO. - Taxman ^Talk 00:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Possible spam link

Someone added a link to http://car-model-08.blogspot.com, a blog which at first glance seems to promote car donation, but I cannot find contact information, or the legal advice it claims to contain. I would appreciate if someone could take a look at the blog and either support or reject my conclusion that it is spam. It should be noted that the link was added to Automobile and Car model as well, which adds to my suspicions. But if it should be anywhere, it should be on this page. --τις (talk) 13:07, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Kars4Kids

I added kars4kids, which someone delated, because it is one of the leading (if not *the* leading) car-donation programs in the U.S. How can you talk about long-distance service without mentioning AT&T? Or fast-food without mentioning McDonalds? Kars4Kids, with its annoying jingle, is certainly the most recognized player in this field. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.19.148.90 (talk) 16:19, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Please review the Wikipedia policies on external links to understand why your link was deleted. Your edit also deleted properly cited material from the article, such edits are generally regarded as poor form. --CliffC (talk) 16:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Car donation/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WP Tax Class== Start class because needs more references and it only one big section.EECavazos 22:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC) ==WP Tax Priority== Low priority because the article is on a method to get a tax deduction.EECavazos 22:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 22:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Car donation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130509014007/http://cardonors.org:80/benefits-of-donating/ to http://cardonors.org/benefits-of-donating/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC)