Talk:Caranx lugubris
 | A fact from Caranx lugubris appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 6,617 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- Hey Ryan, could you recheck the source that says the maximum length is 221 cm ? I left it there for now, but that's a big discrepancy between what Fishbase says and what that book says. Kare Kare (talk) 08:59, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, i cant remember where i got that off the top of my head. for now i'd say go with fishbase, but i'll keep looking into it. it may have come from a semi-reputable reference i used when i was writing the article, but the book is back home (im at collage now) so i'll see what the relatives say. peace. Ryan shell (talk) 16:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- p.s. i got the info on the spines straight from fishbase
- Don't worry too much, its not a big deal, just thought a recheck might be useful. On another note, i can't understand how a fish with a circumtropical distribution can have so little information published on it. Most species present in the Atlantic have gallons of published information on their biology and ecology. Not a single paper deals with the black jack's diet or reproduction... i guess it must be a rare fish. Kare Kare (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- p.s. i got the info on the spines straight from fishbase
- yeah, i know what you mean. maybe its just rare in areas where people are looking for papers to write! I'll keep an eye out for diet and repro stuff. and i'll make sure IUCN hasn't listed it. Ryan shell (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, i cant remember where i got that off the top of my head. for now i'd say go with fishbase, but i'll keep looking into it. it may have come from a semi-reputable reference i used when i was writing the article, but the book is back home (im at collage now) so i'll see what the relatives say. peace. Ryan shell (talk) 16:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black jack (fish). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110611170140/http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/cunningham/CunninghamCourse/Traditional11.pdf to http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/cunningham/CunninghamCourse/Traditional11.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)