Talk:Carbon emissions reporting
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
School project edits
editIn the next few days this page will soon get a significant revision and subsequent editing from students participating in the Public Policy Initiative. This article was chosen because it is missing content or sourcing and has been relatively innactive. Their draft articles are being formed in their user space and will be transfered here. Links to the drafts can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy/Courses/Political Economy of Technology and Science fall 2010. I will not be allowing students to that first initial transfer unless their article has been significantly improved in references and content. Please provide comments on the significant revisions and help the students improve the Wikipedia formatting. However, I would greatly appreciate that any major content changes be suggested to the students on the talk page so that they get the experience editing collaboratively and through consensus and feedback. The final date for the project is Friday December 10, expect significant editing from now until then. Thank you.
If you have any questions feel free to raise them here or on my talk page, Myself and other WP:Online Ambassadors will be monitoring their edits, so we will also be able to help fix issues on the pages, Sadads (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carbon emissions reporting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120717023520/http://www.wbcsd.org/home.aspx to http://www.wbcsd.org/home.aspx
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130103173826/http://www.mandatorycarbonreporting.com/ to http://www.mandatorycarbonreporting.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
This paragraph does not make sense
editIt has been cut and can be returned to article when the ambiguity has been addressed.
Although organizations must report their greenhouse gas emissions, many companies choose to voluntarily report as their social responsibility and to set standards of sustainable working processes and commitment to reducing the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from their activities.
So, they *must* report but they choose to do so voluntarily? Or are we somehow distinguishing “organizations” from “companies”? Beyond that, the paragraph smells of greenwashing and would benefit from some specifics Elinruby (talk) 06:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Scope of the article compared with Carbon accounting?
editSo is some carbon accounting not reported, and if so is it liable to audit? Should the articles be merged? Chidgk1 (talk) 08:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
This article was nominated for merging with Carbon accounting on 2 February 2021. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Merge. |