Talk:Carbon nanotube nanomotor

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

I hope I've left this in a proper state. I was checking my watchlist & saw some odd edits, vandalism as I thought, & reverted from the comparison page, without checking the article first. Oops! Sorry. It's been a long day, I saw red, then I saw sense. Dick Holman.Archolman 01:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

lack of clarity

edit

Hi I seem to have found a lack of clarity in the paragraph under the title 'Firts NEMS nanomotor'. The sentence 'Three fixed stator electrodes (two visible 'in-plane' stators and one 'gate' stator buried beneath the surface) surround the rotor assembly.' does not state of wich material these electrodes are made from. I can't figure it out and there for don't understand how the stator functions arround the rotor? Can anyone please help me understand this parahgraph? note: also the paragraph states that you can look at figure 1.1 and 1.2, but these figures aren't on the page and there is no link to them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.164.245.4 (talk) 19:58, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carbon nanotube nanomotor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)Reply