This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Cardamom Mountains jar burials is part of WikiProject Cambodia, a project to improve all Cambodia-related articles. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group on Wikipedia, aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Cambodia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.CambodiaWikipedia:WikiProject CambodiaTemplate:WikiProject CambodiaCambodia articles
I'm looking for the best picture or any informations about the KAF's U-6 (Beaver). It seem that the KAF had 3 aircrafts.
But in 1971, during the viet cong's sapper attack at the Pochentong Air Base,at least 1 Beaver was destroyed.In 1972
at leat 1 Beaver was refurbished with a new engine.
http://www.khmerairforce.com/AAK-KAF/AVNK-AAK-KAF/Cambodia-Beaver-KAF.JPG
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I just finished peer reviewing your page and I think you've done a great job so far. I think you have a really good lead that introduces the reader to your site in a neutral way. Something that I would suggest adding is more content sections other than the two that you currently have. I thought that your discussion about the influence of trade regarding grave goods was interesting and I think maybe creating a section that separately discusses this topic would be worth considering. I also think that your concluding section is a great idea and I like that you plan to include ongoing research about this site to confirm the idea that more details are still to be found at your site. Keep up the hard work! Ksaldan3 (talk) 23:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just reviewed your page and it looks very good! A few notes I have is that the "Ongoing archaeological efforts" section requires citations. I have also added categories, however the page may require more (I'd like a second pair of eyes for this before removing the categorization tag).
Nice job!
--Izlhyl (talk) 20:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply