Talk:Caridina gracilirostris

A fact from Caridina gracilirostris appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 March 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that if the beak-like rostrum on Caridina gracilirostris is broken off, it will regrow itself?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/March.

Wikipedia

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 21 March 2009 by reviewer Fingerz (talk · contribs).

Arthropods Low‑importance

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Behaviour section needs reworking

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The two sentences under the last section "Behaviour" do not belong there. They seem more like opinions..."...will coexist given their temperment"? and "..entertaining water currents". Any thoughts? prashanthns (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

More work on the refs needed as well. prashanthns (talk) 17:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Even the last sentence (The swimming of the shrimp has been described as "entertaining") seems a superfluous personal interpretation. A bigger issue, however, is the image representation, which is not particularly indicative for the species. Unfortunately, most pictures found on the Internet are not, as they tend to be blurry and show exaggerated coloring. The only good and high quality images I have found that truely show the shrimp as they are, are on the site of Fred Miranda. I have provided a link in the references, and will ask him if it would be possible to use one of his images as the main image for the article. WillemV369 (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article Reversion

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have reverted this article to the version that existed before my own contributions. I made my contributions based on a wrong assumption. The shrimp I have were shown to be Caridina gracilirostris on this site: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/322234/0. However, this is not true. The red nose of this species is misleading. The actual species turns out to be Macrobrachium Celebensis. Further cross-referencing has highlighted the observed differences between the two species. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WillemV369 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic