Talk:Carl Au/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello again. I should be able to respond in reasonably time. Soaper1234 - talk 22:32, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Due to some unforeseen computer issues, I've not been able to respond as quickly as I would have liked. However, I'll try to respond in the next couple of days. I also have a couple bits of information to add to the article, as well as the recommendations below. Soaper1234 - talk 22:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Actual birthdate seems like a requirement for GA.
  • Done some digging and found it. Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
• Add commas after "dancer" and Ostrich Boys.
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
• "began" → "begun"
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Early life

• "graduated from in 2008"
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Career

• Remove the comma after "Pet Shop Boys dancers".
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
• "from May" → "in May"
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
• "in new play" → "in the play"
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
• "guest starred" → "guest-starred"
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Filmography

• Knowing each role also feels like a requirement.
  • Is this in response to the Copperfield role? If so, it can be removed. Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Awards and nominations

• Since there's only one award I would remove the "Work" column, at least for now.
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

References

• Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).
  •  Done Soaper1234 - talk 12:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·