Talk:Carl Linnaeus bibliography

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Science Taskforce (assessed as High-importance).

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should this page not be merged with the Carl Linnaeus page, as a section with published works in there? Or was it moved here because it took up to much space.Beefcake6412 (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Infobox removed

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the infobox but provided a bad link in the edit summary. The correct link is Is Infobox bibliography a good thing?. RockMagnetist (talk) 22:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic