Talk:Carlos Brilhante Ustra
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carlos Brilhante Ustra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stub classification
editThis article needs references added as it is totally unreferenced at the moment. Capitalistroadster (talk) 08:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Article description
editI added a description to this article which stated Ustra was a "Brazilian torturer, army officer and politician", this is the order it seamed for me to be the most accurate, since Ustra's main relevance factor comes from being one of Brazil's greatest torturers during the Military Dictatorship and the first to be consideredas such by a court. However, the edit was reverted probably because it seemed partial, in fact, in the article itself put it in a different order: Brazilian army officer, politician, and torturer. The problem there is that the order probably should be the one I put in the description, since Ustra is only really relevant because he was a torturer in the Military Dictatorship. I wonder what would be the best way forward: add an article description with the same order as in the article or change the order in the article to the relevance-first order (toturer, army officer, politician)? Or something else? Thanks :) LucasSuperti (talk) 07:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)