Talk:Carlos Javier Jarquín
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because this is not a hoax. I have been in contact with this person, who is real. Please, be so kind and allow for some time to rewrite the article. --Fadesga (talk) 22:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Promotional and conflict of interest
editConflict of interest: the user Fadezca is actually the poet Fabio Descalzi (see his user page), I did research on Google and Descalzi has been published by Jarquin in the newspapers where he collaborates, so there is a promotional mobile for Fabio Descalzi towards Jarquin. Reference: https://www.diariosigloxxi.com/texto-diario/mostrar/4848478/poemas-poeta-uruguayo-fabio-descalzi
Irrelevant and promotional
editAfter doing a long search on Google I see that the books published by Jarquin are by Amazon publishers and are anthologies self-publicized by the newspapers where he collaborates, Jarquin's image is completely built as self-promotion. I think that if they really want accommodation for his biography, they could make it their own website and not use Wikipedia to promote it. CarmenNozal64 (talk) 22:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. If you let me: here you are a reference from an independent source. Fadesga (talk) 22:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Obvious promotion in article: without encyclopedic relevance
editCrossing Wikipedia I saw this article, and I started to investigate and investigate more, I was surprised that Carlos Jarquin is a character created by himself in a promotional manner, all the notes and articles where he appears on the internet are written by friends of Jarquin, for example, Aracelly Diaz Vargas wrote this promotional note about Jarquin on the "Posdatapress" website: https://posdatadigital.press/contenido/12179/poesia-planetaria
and in turn Carlos Jarquin writes promotional articles about Aracelly Diaz Vargas on the website "plumas libre": https://plumaslibres.com.mx/2024/06/12/entrevista-a-la-poeta-nicaraguense-aracelly-diaz-vargas/
In conclusion, if we start to review and investigate on Google, there are many of these examples that clearly demonstrate that this article is merely promotional and that the notes about Jarquin in web media are made by people and friends close to him.
To conclude, I give another hard evidence, the user who made this article is actually the poet Fabio Descalzi (see the user page "Fadesga") and the writer Fabio Descalzi has recently been published by Carlos Jarquin on various web pages like this one: https://www.diariosigloxxi.com/texto-diario/mostrar/4848478/poemas-poeta-uruguayo-fabio-descalzi
In addition, his only two publications are self-published by Amazon. Evidence: https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Carlos-Javier-Jarqu%C3%ADn-Sr/dp/B0CCCS42RC
https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Ayame-Editorial/dp/B09GC992S4
We do not need to be knowledgeable or intellectual that this page is an obvious conflict of interest on the part of Fabio Descalzi for promoting Carlos Jarquin, here the interesting thing and the summary of everything is that we discover that in the same way that Descalzi wants to promote Jarquin as a commercial exchange of interests, in this way the "character" of Jarquin is created as self-promotion, therefore, and according to clear evidence, the page "Carlos Javier Jarquin" must be deleted from Wikipedia without any doubt
Note: I have also reviewed the history of the Wikipedia page in Spanish about Carlos Jarquin and it has been deleted 4 times for being promotional.
Do not delete this article
editI am Carlos Jarquin, first of all I appreciate his comments on the relevance of the page, and I consider that this article about me should not be deleted, since it does have encyclopedic relevance, here are my arguments:
1. It is true that my books have been published by me on Amazon as the evidence indicates, but that does not take away from the great success that these have had, since they have reached many readers from Amazon's various intercontinental platforms.
2. The fact that my friends like Aracelly Diaz or Ana Ayala have written and published on websites about me does not take away the relevance of this article, in fact they are very relevant people and their opinions about my work are objective and true.
3. I have held various virtual meetings of poets, such as the meeting "Honoring Death", where I have brought together poets from various countries; these meetings have had an important impact on the international community.
3. I cannot deny that what they say about this article is true in terms of the arguments and evidence, but that has nothing to do with the relevance of the article and much less does it mean that that is why the page is promotional.
4. I have known the writer Fabio Descalzi (user:Fadesga) who created this article personally for a long time and the fact that I have published various articles about his poetry in various media does not mean that he made this page for that reason. about me to promote me, on the contrary, he does it with the intention of continuing to disseminate the work of various people and journalists from Nicaragua and Central America as part of his Wikipedia projects. CarlosJJ70 (talk) 00:54, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Vandalism of the user "Iris Lop" possible puppetry of the user "Fadesga"
editUser "Iris Lop" arbitrarily removes Wikipedia's maintenance tags so that Wikipedia users cannot review the page's reliability in terms of its obvious "promotional" and "non-encyclopedic" appearance. Everything seems to indicate that the user "Iris lop" is the puppet of the user "Fadesga" to delete maintenance templates and thus maintain without any discussion or dialogue the page that he created. Micaela089 (talk) 01:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)