Talk:Carnegie Learning

The logo is old - Carnegie Learning has a new logo as of April 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.109.87.201 (talk) 13:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Great to hear! I'll track down some of the early company history to see what I can add. We don't want this to be an advertisement. Tk101 21:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

I think this is better. This really highlights the history and science behind the creation of the Cognitive Tutor. I think this article is definitely out of the possible deletion category. Now we should focus on expanding it past the "stub" classification. Cpkondas 19:50, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

We were notified that our listing needed references - please let me know if I can provide anything more. Tk101 16:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

This article reads like an advertisement

This article was seemingly edited by a marketing department. It makes bold unreferenced claims about products and reads more like a pamphlet and less like an encyclopedia. An example from the text would suggest it was indeed written by Carnegie Learning "Our instruction strengthens student conceptual..." The use of the word "our" is a slip up. Please fix this article (not a listing) by toning down the use of adjectives to make it more encyclopedic, include third party references from studies to back up the claims, or delete it entirely.Thx1138az (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

• • • I agree with the above comment: this article reads exactly like an ad for Carnegie. There is no citation for its proven success. Please fix. *** 108.218.252.215 (talk) 18:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)