This article is totally plagiarized from The Dispatch Online.--John Foxe 20:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


This article was not plagiarized. This is a mixture of several papers that I have written, being a NC historian. I'm not familiar with "The Dispatch," but if they have this article, then it came from me, not the other way around. In which case "The Dispatch" would be in the wrong, plagiarizing my work. Marcus Constantine 18:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Marcus ConstantineReply


I found the website you were talking about. It's [1] Also, they state at the top of all of their articles that it comes from Wikipedia. That's fine with me. However, please refrain from calling this plagiarism, if you don't read the other websites sources. Marcus Constantine 18:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed some grammatical errors (run-on sentence or two) in the article and I think it should be marked for further review. Audrun 16:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Why not just fix the grammatical errors you noticed? --orlady 16:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply