Talk:Carolinas–Virginia Tube Reactor
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Carolinas–Virginia Tube Reactor be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in South Carolina may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editAssigned B-Class on the basis of adequate references and significant discussion of subject. Low importance assigned as the plant in not currently in operation but was notable in the development of commercial nuclear power. Civilengtiger (talk) 19:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Raison d'etre
editWhy was the reactor decommissioned? Why was it built in the first place, power or plutonium? Ottawakismet (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Number of employees
editIt would be useful to have more information on numbers and types of employees at these facilities = how much did they hire county employees? New paths to work? effect on county economy?Parkwells (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carolinas–Virginia Tube Reactor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070413144843/http://canteach.candu.org/library/D407_scr1.pdf to http://canteach.candu.org/library/D407_scr1.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070413144843/http://canteach.candu.org/library/D407_scr1.pdf to http://canteach.candu.org/library/D407_scr1.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Wrong statement on moderators
edit"Several such moderators have been suggested, including carbon dioxide as in the UK Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor, liquid metals including sodium or lead as in various breeder reactors, and heavy water."
This statement is wrong. CO2 in the UK AGR is the coolant; the moderator is graphite. Sodium and lead are not moderators, they are selected as coolants in fast reactors just because they do not moderate neutrons. Fast reactors (the breeders mentioned in the statement) are unmoderated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.83.153.218 (talk) 19:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)